Difference between revisions of "Template:Categorylink"
From Twinsuniverse
J McKalling (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "<includeonly></includeonly><noinclude> {{Stub}} Category:System Templates </noinclude>") |
J McKalling (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<includeonly></includeonly><noinclude> | <includeonly></includeonly><noinclude> | ||
| − | {{Stub}} | + | {{Stub}}This template '''will be''' used as a bridge between the [[Template:Categorizer]] and different type categorizers like [[Template:Gender]]. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Development issues== | ||
| + | What kind of functionality should the category link offer? Should it make the [[Template:superlink|superlink]] optional? | ||
| + | At least it should offer a way to encapsulate the automatic categorization feature within the categorizer template. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The current [[Template:Categorizer]] does both the 'category link' and automatic categorization, but these two features should not be bound. Something else should be able to categorize as well, and sharing code would be desired. | ||
[[Category:System Templates]] | [[Category:System Templates]] | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 22:46, 22 November 2012
| This article is a stub [list all]. You can help the Twinsuniverse by expanding it. |
Development issues
What kind of functionality should the category link offer? Should it make the superlink optional? At least it should offer a way to encapsulate the automatic categorization feature within the categorizer template.
The current Template:Categorizer does both the 'category link' and automatic categorization, but these two features should not be bound. Something else should be able to categorize as well, and sharing code would be desired.
