MediaWiki talk:Monobook.css

I made the background colour light blue. What do you think? Personally I don't really like the current colour, so if you have other suggestions I'm open to suggestions. If you can't see difference, press Ctrl+F5. morshem 12:45, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Hmm, it doesn't seem to work on the main namespace... Actually, that's just a code I copied from Wikipedia, I don't even know what it means :p . morshem 15:59, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Strange, seems like the code is totally messed up. Try checking the manual here and here. --Kobold 20:00, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Too many details for me to bother :p . Maybe wacko knows about this stuff. morshem 21:48, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

I don't like this new colour either :p and I think it would be a good idea while using the "wikipedia" Monobook style, to keep it as consistent to wikipedia as possible. It might confuse irregular visitors otherwise (*big story with lots of usability-related arguments*). If we want a custom design for the Twinsunica it would be better to start from scratch, or at least make it significantly different from Monobook. I think somewhere on the MediaWiki pages they have a gallery of wikis with really cool custom designs, as well as lots of info about making custom layouts.

Anyway, I do kinda like this light pastel-tinted background colour for subpages, like using it for the discussion pages, or only certain namespaces - which it is now accidentally. --Wacko 03:23, 7 June 2007 (CEST)

So... coming back to the question; I have no idea why it only applies to this namespace, I'd have to take a closer look at the CSS. --Wacko 07:23, 7 June 2007 (CEST)