Difference between revisions of "Twinsuniverse talk:Recategorization"
From Twinsuniverse
(Locations by type) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
How many places will the category ''lake'' have? There are many places with are so unique that they don't fit in here. --[[User:Kobold|Kobold]] 13:46, 10 December 2006 (CET) | How many places will the category ''lake'' have? There are many places with are so unique that they don't fit in here. --[[User:Kobold|Kobold]] 13:46, 10 December 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | :Well [[Clear Water Lake]] would be one. Actually the only one. Maybe we should scrap type-categories with only one article. Name-categories shouldn't be scrapped, unless it's way too specific. So categories for islands should be created, but smaller areas should only get an category where there are 3(?) or more articles. --[[User:Elmuerte|elmuerte]] 15:58, 10 December 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 14:58, 10 December 2006
Characters by location
I'm not sure about this subcategory. The old "... inhabitants" isn't always correct. Since not all characters live at the location they are encountered. Maybe it needs to be very strict that only characters that actually live there are included or we might was well ommit it as a category. --elmuerte 21:30, 6 December 2006 (CET)
- I think you should only list people who actually life on the correspoinding island. This will of course result in that not all characters can be found in the category characters by location. --Kobold 21:52, 6 December 2006 (CET)
Locations by type
How many places will the category lake have? There are many places with are so unique that they don't fit in here. --Kobold 13:46, 10 December 2006 (CET)
- Well Clear Water Lake would be one. Actually the only one. Maybe we should scrap type-categories with only one article. Name-categories shouldn't be scrapped, unless it's way too specific. So categories for islands should be created, but smaller areas should only get an category where there are 3(?) or more articles. --elmuerte 15:58, 10 December 2006 (CET)
