Difference between revisions of "Twinsuniverse:Peer Reviews"

From Twinsuniverse
Jump to: navigation, search
m (tpyo fix)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Peer reviews are a way to guarantee quality to a certain degrees. It basically comes down to others reading an article and comment on them. Since this is a wiki environment errors can be fixed immediately. Uncertainties can be discussed in the article's discussion page.
 
Peer reviews are a way to guarantee quality to a certain degrees. It basically comes down to others reading an article and comment on them. Since this is a wiki environment errors can be fixed immediately. Uncertainties can be discussed in the article's discussion page.
  
Try review an article whenever you can. An good idea would be to pick a [[Special:Random|random]] article to review.
+
Try review an article whenever you can. A good idea would be to pick a [[Special:Random|random]] article to review.
  
 
Articles should not only be reviewed on correctness of the content but also on [[:Category:Twinsunica - Style|style]].
 
Articles should not only be reviewed on correctness of the content but also on [[:Category:Twinsunica - Style|style]].
  
 
[[Category:Twinsunica - Style]]
 
[[Category:Twinsunica - Style]]

Revision as of 18:10, 28 December 2006

Peer reviews are a way to guarantee quality to a certain degrees. It basically comes down to others reading an article and comment on them. Since this is a wiki environment errors can be fixed immediately. Uncertainties can be discussed in the article's discussion page.

Try review an article whenever you can. A good idea would be to pick a random article to review.

Articles should not only be reviewed on correctness of the content but also on style.