Difference between revisions of "MediaWiki talk:Monobook.css"
From Twinsuniverse
(→Round corners) |
J McKalling (Talk | contribs) m (→Round corners) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::I like the round corners, it reminds me of the pixelated rounded corners in the LBA2 menus. | ::I like the round corners, it reminds me of the pixelated rounded corners in the LBA2 menus. | ||
::I'm not sure what I think of the different colour in the non-main namespaces. If you want to have it back though, do you want me to take a look? --[[User:Wacko|Wacko]] 18:29, 4 July 2007 (CEST) | ::I'm not sure what I think of the different colour in the non-main namespaces. If you want to have it back though, do you want me to take a look? --[[User:Wacko|Wacko]] 18:29, 4 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | ::Oh, and I don't see rounded corners in MSIE6. Maybe it works in IE7 though. --[[User:Wacko|Wacko]] 18:31, 4 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | :::Morshem already said it. Rounded corners only work in a Mozilla browser. - [[User:Kobold|Kobold]] 20:02, 7 July 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No they don't. At least not anymore. In all those years, the browsers have started supporting them, and, with the new webkit standard, all major browsers support them. I have included the mozilla version for backwards compatibility for the infoboxes, but the monobook skin itself currently only has the new version. I recommend checking whether the monobook skin and infoboxes both have rounded corners with you as well. -[[User:J McKalling|J McKalling]] ([[User talk:J McKalling|talk]]) 23:15, 25 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:15, 25 November 2012
I made the background colour light blue. What do you think? Personally I don't really like the current colour, so if you have other suggestions I'm open to suggestions. If you can't see difference, press Ctrl+F5. morshem 12:45, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
- Hmm, it doesn't seem to work on the main namespace... Actually, that's just a code I copied from Wikipedia, I don't even know what it means :p . morshem 15:59, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
- Strange, seems like the code is totally messed up. Try checking the manual here and here. --Kobold 20:00, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
- Too many details for me to bother :p . Maybe wacko knows about this stuff. morshem 21:48, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
- I don't like this new colour either :p and I think it would be a good idea while using the "wikipedia" Monobook style, to keep it as consistent to wikipedia as possible. It might confuse irregular visitors otherwise (*big story with lots of usability-related arguments*). If we want a custom design for the Twinsunica it would be better to start from scratch, or at least make it significantly different from Monobook. I think somewhere on the MediaWiki pages they have a gallery of wikis with really cool custom designs, as well as lots of info about making custom layouts.
- Too many details for me to bother :p . Maybe wacko knows about this stuff. morshem 21:48, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
- Strange, seems like the code is totally messed up. Try checking the manual here and here. --Kobold 20:00, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
- Anyway, I do kinda like this light pastel-tinted background colour for subpages, like using it for the discussion pages, or only certain namespaces - which it is now accidentally. --Wacko 03:23, 7 June 2007 (CEST)
- So... coming back to the question; I have no idea why it only applies to this namespace, I'd have to take a closer look at the CSS. --Wacko 07:23, 7 June 2007 (CEST)
- Actually, it applies to all spaces than the articles'. It's meant to be like that according to the instructions in Wikipedia, from which I copied this code. morshem 10:30, 7 June 2007 (CEST)
- So... coming back to the question; I have no idea why it only applies to this namespace, I'd have to take a closer look at the CSS. --Wacko 07:23, 7 June 2007 (CEST)
- Anyway, I do kinda like this light pastel-tinted background colour for subpages, like using it for the discussion pages, or only certain namespaces - which it is now accidentally. --Wacko 03:23, 7 June 2007 (CEST)
Round corners
I made the corners round... what do you think? If you find it ugly, I'll just remove it. morshem 12:27, 4 July 2007 (CEST)
- Also, from what I understood it only works in Firefox... in case somebody uses IE for some reason :p morshem 12:29, 4 July 2007 (CEST)
- Another thing, for some reason the background colour was changed back to white when I did that. I went through lots of hassle trying to change it back, but to no avail. I gave up eventually and changed it back to white. morshem 15:43, 4 July 2007 (CEST)
- I like the round corners, it reminds me of the pixelated rounded corners in the LBA2 menus.
- I'm not sure what I think of the different colour in the non-main namespaces. If you want to have it back though, do you want me to take a look? --Wacko 18:29, 4 July 2007 (CEST)
- Oh, and I don't see rounded corners in MSIE6. Maybe it works in IE7 though. --Wacko 18:31, 4 July 2007 (CEST)
- Morshem already said it. Rounded corners only work in a Mozilla browser. - Kobold 20:02, 7 July 2007 (CEST)
No they don't. At least not anymore. In all those years, the browsers have started supporting them, and, with the new webkit standard, all major browsers support them. I have included the mozilla version for backwards compatibility for the infoboxes, but the monobook skin itself currently only has the new version. I recommend checking whether the monobook skin and infoboxes both have rounded corners with you as well. -J McKalling (talk) 23:15, 25 November 2012 (GMT)
